![Tejashwi Yadav's engagement](https://www.online-pressrelease.com/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Tejashwi-Yadavs-engagement-Will-marry-childhood-friend-Rajshree-Know-where-both-of-them-met-for-the-first-time.jpg)
Tejashwi Yadav’s engagement Will marry childhood friend Rajshree; Know where both of them met for the first time
Tejashwi Yadav’s engagement The marriage of Tejashwi Yadav, the younger son of Rashtriya Janata Dal supremo Lalu Prasad Yadav and Leader of Opposition in Bihar Legislative Assembly, has been fixed. He is going to marry his school friend Rajshree. Secret preparations are also going on in Delhi regarding the engagement. According to the information received from the sources, Tejashwi Yadav can also get married tomorrow soon after the Ring Ceremony. A source close to the Lalu family said that all the preparations have been completed in a farmhouse. Soon after the ring ceremony, preparations have been made for the marriage.
School friend will make his bride
Regarding the marriage of Tejashwi Yadav, it is being said that he is going to take seven rounds with his school friend Rajshree. Tejashwi Yadav and his future bride Rajshree are childhood friends and both studied together at Delhi Public School in Delhi. It is said that the two have been friends for many years. As soon as Tejashwi Yadav took over the post of Deputy CM of Bihar, the friendship of both of them progressed.
Tejashwi is doing interracial marriage
Tejashwi’s ring ceremony is going to be held in Delhi on Thursday. This marriage will be interracial. The girl is originally from Rewari district of Haryana. He has a house in Friends Colony, Delhi. The Lalu family has kept it very secret. Nearby people have also not been informed. Tejashwi’s seven sisters, brother-in-law, and children, including Tej Pratap Yadav, have reached Delhi.
Initially, there were talks that it was the anniversary of Misa Bharti’s marriage, but gradually the layers started to peel off. The news gained momentum because Misa was married on December 10, 1999, but questions were raised as to why the 22nd year of marriage needed so much fanfare. Had it been the 25th year, it would have been a problem.